Generative AI

How to Treat Generative AI Image Problems


Bonnie Moss, president and founder of Moss Networks navigates through the haze of sensationalism, revealing the true capabilities, implications, and potential pitfalls of Generative AI. From its impact on employment to its role in safeguarding privacy.

Generative AI is one of the more exciting technologies to hit the market in a long time. But at times, it’s also one of the most misunderstood. This is a shame because the confusion and hype surrounding it isn’t doing anyone – providers, users, and potential beneficiaries – any favors.

The sooner we clear things up, the sooner we reap its true benefits.

Generative AI is Not Going to Wipe Out Humanity

I recognize that the Center for AI Safety warned that AI could lead to societal-scale risks, such as pandemics and nuclear war. The Center’s statement made headlines for days. The many voices of reason were lost in those sensational headlines, specifically the numerous experts who rightly countered that generative AI was far from that capability.

The fact is that generative AI needs humans to train it on things humans have created. Take ChatGPT as an example, which essentially predicts what someone might say based on what people have said in the past. Generative AI can’t make the kind of colossal leap required to enslave humanity – a scenario so profoundly unique it would require massive amounts of human-labeled data to execute. 

At that point, who is doing the evil deed, the data scientists who curate and label the data or the AI itself? Maybe someday, there will be a technology capable of enslaving humans without our input, but it won’t be AI, given its dependence on humans.

It does seem to me, however, that this warning is an attempt to deflect attention away from the real challenges of AI, namely discrimination and potential violations of privacy – precisely the things the regulators are warning us about.

See More: Can Generative AI Help Stressed-Out IT Professionals?

Generative AI, like All AI, Will Change Work, Not Eliminate Workers

AI has scared the American workforce ever since I can remember. Back in 2016, a survey conducted by KRC Research found that 82% of workers feared that AI was coming for their jobs.

In April 2023, a Goldman Sachs report warned generative AI could eliminate up to 300 million jobs – if it lived up to its touted capabilities. Hollywood writers went on strike partly due to a fear of ChatGPT writing television and movie scripts. After all, entertainment studios did have open job recommendations for generative AI specialists. Those job descriptions described different tasks, such as deploying it to make better content recommendations to end users.

But writers need not fear – at least not yet. Research from Freelancer.com found that AI wasn’t equal to the creativity of humans. Freelancer.com looked at 280,000 jobs posted to its site and found that in the second quarter of 2023, while the writers’ strike began, creative writing jobs were up 58%.

“AI can’t replace creativity yet. While workers and businesses are benefiting from productivity gains offered by generative AI, the data suggests that the technology in its current form isn’t able to replace creative work. We saw a similar trend occur in the first quarter of the year, as creative design jobs were flourishing despite interest for generative AI tripling,” Matt Barrie, Chief Executive at Freelancer.com, says in the report. What’s more, many freelance writers are earning serious money. CNBC found writers on the site who charge a rate of $250 per hour.

But generative AI, like all AI, is changing work for the better by eliminating the drudgery of repetitive tasks and enabling workers to focus on their jobs’ strategic and creative aspects. For instance, OpenWeb’s 2024 Media Trends ReportOpens a new window