Strategic Site Readiness Program (SSRP) | Incentives and Taxes

Criteria

General Criteria for Consideration of all SSRP Awards:

To the extent reasonably applicable as reasonably determined by the MSF board to the type of project proposed, the MSF shall consider and document at least all of the following criteria for all SSRP awards before entering into a written agreement:

• The importance of the project or eligible activities to the community in which it is located and the state of Michigan;
• If the project will act as a catalyst for additional revitalization of the community where it is located and the state of Michigan;
• The amount of local community and financial support for the project;
• The amount of any other economic assistance or support provided by Michigan for the project;
• The amount of any other economic assistance or support provided by the federal government for the project, including without limitation, federal appropriations or tax credits;
• The amount of any private funds or investments for the project, including the eligible applicant’s own investments in the project;
• The eligible applicant’s financial need for a grant, loan, or other economic assistance under the SSRP;
• The extent of reuse of vacant buildings, public or private, reuse of historic resources and redevelopment of blighted property;
• Creation or retention of qualified jobs as a result of a technological shift in product or production at the project location and within Michigan;
• Whether and how the project is financially and economically sound;
• Whether and how the project converts abandoned public buildings to private use;
• Whether and how the project promotes sustainable development;
• Whether and how the project involves the rehabilitation of a historic resource;
• Whether and how the project addresses area-wide redevelopment;
• Whether and how the project addresses underserved markets of commerce;
• The level and extent of environmental contamination;
• Whether and how the project will compete with or affect existing Michigan businesses within the same industry;
• Whether and how the project’s proximity to rail and utility will impact the performance of the project and will maximize energy and logistics needs in the community in which it is located, and in Michigan;
• The risk of obsolescence that the project, products, and investments in the future;
• The overall return on investment to Michigan;
• Whether the proposed strategic site or mega-strategic site is incorporated into a strategic plan of a political subdivision of the state of Michigan; and
• Any other additional criteria approved by the MSF board that are specific to each individual project, and consistent with the purpose of the SSRP.

Specific Criteria for a Strategic Site Where an End User Has Not Been Identified

For a strategic site for which an end user has not been specifically identified, the MSF shall consider and document as reasonably determined by the MSF:

• Each of the general criteria for consideration of all SSRP awards listed above;
• The degree to which the proposed site demonstrates a high level of competitiveness for future development, considering and documenting all of the following:
  • Whether the proposed site is currently assembled;
  • Whether the proposed site is under site control; and
  • Whether the proposed site is of a size, configuration, location, and condition that makes the site substantially ready for marketing and competitive for development upon completion of the SSRP award, and demonstrated matching contributions;
• Whether the proposed investment will result in the elimination of blight and the remediation of environmental contamination;
• The degree of local matching contributions;
• Whether the SSRP award will promote geographic equity in the distribution of funds among different areas of Michigan;
• Whether the eligible applicant has pursued all available cost-containment measures and,
• Whether the application contains a site assessment and investment proposal developed pursuant to the SSRP Guidelines.

Each site receiving funding under Section 88t(5) shall be submitted to the MEDC for inclusion in a statewide inventory of large strategic sites.

Specific Criteria for a Mega-Strategic Site where an End User Has Not Been Identified

For a mega-strategic site for which an end user has not been specifically identified, the MSF shall consider, and document as reasonably determined by the MSF:

• Each of the general criteria for consideration of all SSRP awards listed above;
• The degree to which the proposed site demonstrates a high level of competitiveness for future development, considering and documenting all of the following:
  • Whether the proposed site is currently assembled;
  • Whether the proposed site is under site control; and
  • Whether the proposed site is of a size, configuration, location, and condition that makes the site substantially ready for marketing and competitive for development upon completion of the SSRP award, and demonstrated matching contributions;
• Whether the proposed mega-strategic site is supported by a strategic analysis that supports the demand for the proposed site;
• The feasibility of proposed land acquisition;
• Utility and transportation availability and the feasibility of necessary utility and transportation improvements;
• Workforce availability and training capability;
• Environmental and topographical conditions and the feasibility of necessary site improvements to address environmental and topographical conditions and,
• Whether the proposal is consistent with the MSF’s Mega-Strategic Site strategic plan

In making an award for a mega-strategic site without a specifically identified end user, the MSF, working in collaboration with the eligible applicant, shall prepare a mega-strategic site investment strategy and spending plan that details the sequence and cost of anticipated investments in the selected site, the benchmarks for bringing the mega-strategic site to a marketable condition, and the marketing strategy for the mega-strategic site. Each plan must have the objective of establishing a certified mega-strategic site under a nationally recognized third-party certification program.

Specific Criteria for a Strategic Site and a Mega-Strategic Site Where an End User Has Been Identified:

For a strategic site and a mega-strategic site for which an end user has been specifically identified, the MSF shall consider, and document as reasonably determined by the MSF:

• Each of the general criteria for consideration of all SSRP awards listed above;
• The strategic economic importance of the project to the community where it is located and Michigan;
• Whether the financial assistance is needed to secure the project in Michigan;
• The degree to which the project is a priority for the local governmental unit or local economic development corporation in the jurisdiction of which the site is located;
• The level of creation or retention of qualified jobs as a result of a technological shift in product or production;
• Whether the qualified jobs created or retained as a result of a technological shift in product or production equal or exceed the average wage for the county in which the project is located;
• The level of capital investment; and
• The evidence of the end user’s commitment to the site.

Specific Criteria for landfill facilities redevelopment for future economic development, the Michigan Strategic Fund shall give priority to projects that meet all of the following criteria:

• The site was used as a landfill and contains solid waste placed on or under the property;
• The site has not been actively used for solid waste in the immediately preceding 15 years;
• The current owner of the site did not cause or contribute to the solid waste disposal at the site;
• The current owner of the site has agreed to contribute an amount equal to at least 10% of the total grant amount toward necessary environmental remediation costs;
• Private investment into the project will total at least $15,000,000, exclusive of environmental remediation costs; and
• Projects that can be initiated in the immediate near-term following award.

Evaluation Criteria for Redevelopment of Landfill Facilities

Public Act 94 of 2022 authorized the MSF to make grants to Eligible Applicants to remediate or redevelop landfill facilities for future economic development. The MSF shall give priority to projects that meet all of the following criteria:

• The site was used as a landfill and contains solid waste placed on or under the property;
• The site has not been actively used for solid waste in the immediately preceding 15 years;
• The current owner of the site did not cause or contribute to the solid waste disposal at the site;
• The current owner of the site has agreed to contribute an amount equal to at least 10% of the total grant amount toward necessary environmental remediation costs;
• Private investment into the project will total at least $15,000,000, exclusive of environmental remediation costs; and
• Projects that can be initiated in the immediate near-term following award.

Each site receiving funding under this section shall be submitted to the MEDC for inclusion in a statewide inventory of large strategic sites.

Application Process and Evaluation Criteria for Awards to Local Economic Development Organizations

Section 88t(11) of the MSF Act authorizes the MSF to make grants and provide technical assistance to local economic development organizations for the purposes of creating an inventory of development-ready sites, provided that the inventory shall utilize nationally recognized criteria to identify the readiness of those sites for improvement. The MSF shall consider the following criteria for applications received from Eligible Applicants for funding under section 88t(11):

• Whether the Eligible Applicant has a project plan or spending plan for the intended use of funds with target outcomes and schedule, including subgrants necessary to implement the Eligible Activities;
• Whether the Eligible Applicant has identified, or intends to identify, sites that meet location initial screening criteria of transportation and workforce availability, as appropriate for site size ranges;
• Whether the availability of energy and utilities is included as a screening factor for identifying sites;
• For identified sites, known acquisition cost and likelihood of acquisition;
• Whether the Eligible Applicant has sites identified that are brownfields or blighted property with potential for reuse.

For the funds appropriated to the SSRP by Public Act 94 of 2022 for the purpose of making awards under Section 88t(11), grant awards will be made distributed by prosperity region using a population-based formula. Each site receiving funding under Section 88t(11) shall be submitted to the MEDC for inclusion in a statewide inventory of large strategic sites.